Difference between revisions of "Doc talk:Flower Animation"
m (more internal link and syntax? (strike old talks)) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | * This page could have more internal links and more syntax/style involved --[[User:D.j.a.y|D.j.a.y]] ([[User talk:D.j.a.y|talk]]) 08:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC) | |
| − | Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals, and then mask that layer when | + | <strike>So, if this tutorial is correct, does it mean that ''any'' object created in an animation is going to be a part of the entire scene? There's no way to sgnify when an object is needed in a scene and not needed? Wouldn't that lead to jast having a lot of objects moved off the stage until needed? That might clutter up a lot of animations. Maybe a function needs to be made for this. An object could be designated as 'backstage' which means that it's just not there for those frames.</strike> |
| + | |||
| + | <strike>''--> I'm still a beginner at synfig-studio, so my answer may not be correct. To me it seems that any created object last the lenght of the scene - I didn't find any way to completely remove an object from a part of the scene, appart from setting its amount to zero. '' <br/></strike> | ||
| + | <strike>''Also note this tutorial is still a kind of draft, I learned new things since I wrote it, and hopefully I'll have the time to re-wrote it today, in a better way.''</strike> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <strike>Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals in a layer, and then mask that layer when the petals aren't needed? Then you could remove the mask right when they are supposed to start appearing.</strike> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <strike>''--> Well, good idea. I will use this in the next version.''</strike> | ||
Latest revision as of 11:25, 8 January 2013
- This page could have more internal links and more syntax/style involved --D.j.a.y (talk) 08:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
So, if this tutorial is correct, does it mean that any object created in an animation is going to be a part of the entire scene? There's no way to sgnify when an object is needed in a scene and not needed? Wouldn't that lead to jast having a lot of objects moved off the stage until needed? That might clutter up a lot of animations. Maybe a function needs to be made for this. An object could be designated as 'backstage' which means that it's just not there for those frames.
--> I'm still a beginner at synfig-studio, so my answer may not be correct. To me it seems that any created object last the lenght of the scene - I didn't find any way to completely remove an object from a part of the scene, appart from setting its amount to zero.
Also note this tutorial is still a kind of draft, I learned new things since I wrote it, and hopefully I'll have the time to re-wrote it today, in a better way.
Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals in a layer, and then mask that layer when the petals aren't needed? Then you could remove the mask right when they are supposed to start appearing.
--> Well, good idea. I will use this in the next version.
