Talk:Layers/Time Loop - Revision history

Zelgadis: moved Talk:Time Loop Layer to Talk:Layers/Time Loop

2009-09-06T07:47:38Z

moved Talk:Time Loop Layer to Talk:Layers/Time Loop

Dooglus at 09:55, 28 January 2008

2008-01-28T09:55:00Z

Dooglus: yes, it should, so I fixed it; thanks :)

2007-10-03T22:37:53Z

yes, it should, so I fixed it; thanks :)

Dooglus: Talk:TimeLoop Layer moved to Talk:Time Loop Layer: the layer name changed a while back

2007-10-03T22:26:33Z

Talk:TimeLoop Layer moved to Talk:Time Loop Layer: the layer name changed a while back

Pxegeek: Typo?

2007-08-30T20:55:12Z

Typo?

New page

dooglus - you say
From 5s to 8s, the first 3 seconds of the child layer will play. Then from 8s to 11s, and from 11s to 14s, etc, those first 3 seconds of the child layer will play over and over again.

Note - what actually happens is that for the first 5 seconds, time loops through negative times in the child layer, but since it is impossible (?) to animate anything at negative time points, this should be the same as the time staying at zero. It's not clear whether this is a bug, or whether any existing animations rely on this behaviour. This is how the mapping actually works:
0->-2 1->-1
2->0 3->-2 4->-1
5->0 6->-2 7->-1

Shouldn't that last line be
5->0 6->1 7->2
?

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:55, 28 January 2008
Line 1:	Line 1:
−	+	I probably picked a bad example to show - between 5s and 6.5s the top and bottom circles are in the same place. That's just a coincidence - there need not be any point in time where the Time Loop layer's input time matches the time it uses for drawing its children. Perhaps the example should be redone without this accidental overlap?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 3 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~dooglus - you say~~
−	~~From 5s to 8s, the first 3 seconds of the child layer will play. Then from 8s to 11s, and from 11s to 14s, etc, those first 3 seconds of the child layer will play over and over again.~~

−	Note - what actually happens is that for the first 5 seconds, time loops through negative times in the child layer, but since it is impossible (?) to animate anything at negative time points, this should be the same as the time staying at zero. It's not clear whether this is a bug, or whether any existing animations rely on this behaviour. This is how the mapping actually works:
−	~~0->-2 1->-1~~
−	~~2->0 3->-2 4->-1~~
−	~~5->0 6->-2 7->-1~~
−
−	~~Shouldn't that last line be~~
−	~~5->0 6->1 7->2~~
−	?

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:47, 6 September 2009
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:26, 3 October 2007
(No difference)