Doc talk:Flower Animation - Revision history

D.j.a.y: more internal link and syntax? (strike old talks)

2013-01-08T08:25:01Z

more internal link and syntax? (strike old talks)

Genete: moved Talk:Flower Animation to Doc talk:Flower Animation: Doc namespace

2009-10-18T07:49:50Z

moved Talk:Flower Animation to Doc talk:Flower Animation: Doc namespace

Rore: some answers :)

2007-08-29T08:52:22Z

some answers :)

Zelig at 18:29, 24 August 2007

2007-08-24T18:29:19Z

Zelig at 18:28, 24 August 2007

2007-08-24T18:28:19Z

New page

So, if this tutorial is correct, does it mean that ''any'' object created in an animation is going to be a part of the entire scene? There's no way to sgnify when an object is needed in a scene and not needed? Wouldn't that lead to jast having a lot of objects moved off the stage until needed? That might clutter up a lot of animations. Maybe a function needs to be made for this. An object could be designated as 'backstage' which means that it's just not there for those frames.

Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals, and then mask that layer when to petals aren't needed, removing the mask right when they are supposed to start appearing.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-So, if this tutorial is correct, does it mean that ''any'' object created in an animation is going to be a part of the entire scene? There's no way to sgnify when an object is needed in a scene and not needed? Wouldn't that lead to jast having a lot of objects moved off the stage until needed? That might clutter up a lot of animations. Maybe a function needs to be made for this. An object could be designated as 'backstage' which means that it's just not there for those frames.
+* This page could have more internal links and more syntax/style involved --[[User:D.j.a.y|D.j.a.y]] ([[User talk:D.j.a.y|talk]]) 08:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
-''--> I'm still a beginner at synfig-studio, so my answer may not be correct. To me it seems that any created object last the lenght of the scene - I didn't find any way to completely remove an object from a part of the scene, appart from setting its amount to zero. '' <br/>
+<strike>So, if this tutorial is correct, does it mean that ''any'' object created in an animation is going to be a part of the entire scene? There's no way to sgnify when an object is needed in a scene and not needed? Wouldn't that lead to jast having a lot of objects moved off the stage until needed? That might clutter up a lot of animations. Maybe a function needs to be made for this. An object could be designated as 'backstage' which means that it's just not there for those frames.</strike>
-''Also note this tutorial is still a kind of draft, I learned new things since I wrote it, and hopefully I'll have the time to re-wrote it today, in a better way.''
-Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals in a layer, and then mask that layer when the petals aren't needed? Then you could remove the mask right when they are supposed to start appearing.
+<strike>''--> I'm still a beginner at synfig-studio, so my answer may not be correct. To me it seems that any created object last the lenght of the scene - I didn't find any way to completely remove an object from a part of the scene, appart from setting its amount to zero. '' <br/></strike>
-''--> Well, good idea. I will use this in the next version.''
+<strike>Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals in a layer, and then mask that layer when the petals aren't needed? Then you could remove the mask right when they are supposed to start appearing.</strike>

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 29 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, if this tutorial is correct, does it mean that ''any'' object created in an animation is going to be a part of the entire scene? There's no way to sgnify when an object is needed in a scene and not needed? Wouldn't that lead to jast having a lot of objects moved off the stage until needed? That might clutter up a lot of animations. Maybe a function needs to be made for this. An object could be designated as 'backstage' which means that it's just not there for those frames.		So, if this tutorial is correct, does it mean that ''any'' object created in an animation is going to be a part of the entire scene? There's no way to sgnify when an object is needed in a scene and not needed? Wouldn't that lead to jast having a lot of objects moved off the stage until needed? That might clutter up a lot of animations. Maybe a function needs to be made for this. An object could be designated as 'backstage' which means that it's just not there for those frames.
		+
		+	''--> I'm still a beginner at synfig-studio, so my answer may not be correct. To me it seems that any created object last the lenght of the scene - I didn't find any way to completely remove an object from a part of the scene, appart from setting its amount to zero. '' <br/>
		+	''Also note this tutorial is still a kind of draft, I learned new things since I wrote it, and hopefully I'll have the time to re-wrote it today, in a better way.''

	Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals in a layer, and then mask that layer when the petals aren't needed? Then you could remove the mask right when they are supposed to start appearing.		Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals in a layer, and then mask that layer when the petals aren't needed? Then you could remove the mask right when they are supposed to start appearing.
		+
		+	''--> Well, good idea. I will use this in the next version.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:29, 24 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, if this tutorial is correct, does it mean that ''any'' object created in an animation is going to be a part of the entire scene? There's no way to sgnify when an object is needed in a scene and not needed? Wouldn't that lead to jast having a lot of objects moved off the stage until needed? That might clutter up a lot of animations. Maybe a function needs to be made for this. An object could be designated as 'backstage' which means that it's just not there for those frames.		So, if this tutorial is correct, does it mean that ''any'' object created in an animation is going to be a part of the entire scene? There's no way to sgnify when an object is needed in a scene and not needed? Wouldn't that lead to jast having a lot of objects moved off the stage until needed? That might clutter up a lot of animations. Maybe a function needs to be made for this. An object could be designated as 'backstage' which means that it's just not there for those frames.

−	Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals, and then mask that layer when to petals aren't needed~~, removing~~ the mask right when they are supposed to start appearing.	+	Also, in lieu of this, why not simply encapsulate all the petals in a layer, and then mask that layer when the petals aren't needed? Then you could remove the mask right when they are supposed to start appearing.

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:49, 18 October 2009
(No difference)